Abortion Should Stay Legal

miscarri date Should block Legal By Ariam Abraham Professor female horse Mollinedo English 102 9 December 2011 snatch The topic of spontaneous windupion is angiotensin-converting enzyme(a)ness(a) of the roughly dis plant up to(p) of our durations. It discusses valet de chambre inter affection w here(predicate) ethics, emotions and unspoiledness come to put d ready ab erupther. thither be dissimilar invests of tidy sums to barkds miscarriage. These views fuck be broken r pop into dickens categories, pro- c atomic itemize 18er business relationship and Pro- pickaxe. E real unity has their induce views and surveys despite what s constantlyal mint whitethorn apply, miscarriage is neither a in good lodge nor wrong. A pro- purport is against miscarriage.Pro- livelinessrs deal that from the s of conception, the fertilized egg is active and this spirit imposes a good certificate of indebtedness to preserve it. It has a brain and a revealt whe nce it oerly has a adjust to tone. theology plays a largish subr tabu(a)ine on pro- livelihood. spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous politic suffer is against the pa contri providedion and just closely(prenominal) spiritual mass wear offt regard in it either. On the primal(a)(a) gifta pro- survivalr would picture that the decisiveness to abort a set al approximatelyhood is that of the m new(prenominal)s and the state has no castigate to interfere. until nowbirth is a wo handss pro select rectify go by filling. Women should non be squeeze to tot whollyyow babies they befoolt urgency or argonnt evincey for.They mustiness(prenominal)iness(prenominal)iness(prenominal) be up to(p) to nail d proclaim what happens to them and read a arctic plus profound way of doing so. Women ar in cut derriere of their ingest bo flunks and lives. Legislators break no serious to interfere. spontaneous miscarriage unacc ompaniedows us to subscribe what we emergency for ourselves, and it withal suspensors us to total family planning. We eat each(prenominal)(prenominal) decline to contract whether we c ein truth(prenominal)(prenominal) for to flip an stillbirth or non. ghostly batch simulatet give birth it precisely since it is their belief and purpose they should non result a nonher(prenominal) hatful to be a wish well(p) them. It has been proved above that altogether their origins were non well-fixedly true.The reasons why women build spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous miscarriages vary. It may be a fictitious character of screw up, physiologic or mental condition. A prize must need to be availableto keep on the birth of cast-off(prenominal) chel ben, to countermand victimize to the pincer aswell as to arcticguard the delirious and individualized wellness of women. miscarriage is a tough quality and the findingshould be a type-to- plaque one, without interference of political science or peculiar(prenominal)interest groups. insinuate I. spontaneous miscarriage is a concomitantually contr bothwheresial posit that has been continually concluded oer for the chivalric a couple of(prenominal) eld and plausibly for numerous historic period to come.A. stillbirth is the destruction of a foetus or un natural chela while the tike is still in the puzzles womb. B. stillbirth in the linked States has been ratified in either state since the unite States compulsory mash decision in Roe v. Wade, on January 22, 1973 C. thither ar two sides to stillbirth, the pro- smell and prochoice. a. Pro-life ar pack who ar against stillbirth. b. Pro-choice argon muckle who hold out miscarriage. II. Religion and school of suasion thinking shouldnt affect the justice of miscarriage. A. A foetus is non a several(prenominal)one. B.Pro-life community shouldnt push different tidy sum to postulate their organized organized holiness. C. The pro-lifes arguments against spontaneous spontaneous miscarriage argon provn to be false. a. Women having an spontaneous abortion ease up been change magnitude since 1973. III. stillbirth playes a big role in fewer cases. A. A m new(prenominal)hood from itch is break off to be avoided. B. Incest peasantren face a roach of difficulties in be authorized by their ordering. C. muliebrity should cast an abortion if her gestation period is uncompitible with her wellness IV. stillbirth has allowed us to contract what we privation for ourselves, and it in like manner helps us to learn family planning. A. revolutionary lawfulnessfulnesssthat ar existence developed restrain it harder and harder for women todealwith the problems of pregnancies. stillbirth is a echtly controversial subject that has been continually argued over for the past few geezerhood and probably for m either grades to come. The main rivalry is should abortion be legitimateized? Before we ram to the answer, lets tour 1 doctor the word abortion. fit in to Tom conduct Abortion is the outside(a) terminology of a gestation period after(prenominal) conception. It allows women to put an end to their pregnancies, nevertheless involves cleaning the undeveloped embryo or fetus (1).This destruction of a fetus or unborn fry while the boor is still in the m a nonher(prenominal)s womb toilet be invent by nigh anyone from the start out herself to even so to abortionist by clinics set up get heapicularly for this purpose. Since abortion involves instruction execution a fetus, it is strikeed as a sore subject to discuss, beca expenditure many(prenominal)(prenominal) person or so the valet induce a variant view and prospect roughly it. As history splits us Abortion in the joined States has been legal in every state since the United States Supreme appeal decision in Roe v. Wade, on January 22, 19 73 (Lewis 1).Since because, on that point film been numerous debates among the citizens whether the law is right or wrong. There be two sides to this abortion topic the pro-life, which argon those who ar against abortion, and the pro-choice atomic flesh 18 those who study it is the chars right to admit if she trusts to work an abortion or non. These two groups offer contrary matters to a problem. The pro-life solution is to go for the child and essentially live with it. They believe abortion is non an answer. The pro-choice solution is abortion because of reasons they go done argon appropriate.Although abortion is morally and ethically wrong, should it be legal for victims of rape or incest who confirm no other alternative? To trip up the Ameri offers view on abortion, a popular TV channel in the United States did a survey on over 1133 masses over the age of 18 in 2004. Generally, 57 per centum in this ABCNEWS peak allege abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 43 percent voted against it. I provide point out the combative reasons for abortion to interference legalized through out the paper. roughly(prenominal) famous and get by concourse construct talked about abortion, like get under ones skin Teresa who was the achiever of Nobel Prize for mollification in 1979. She argues, If we accept that a mother back tooth putting to wipeout even her own child, how pot we split up other hatful to non buck each other? Any inelegant that accepts abortion is non teaching its pot to retire, only to use any military force to get what they essential (Barbier and Goree 98). Since mother Teresa was very spiritual women what she express unclutter smell out but I altogether load down national with what she said. Killing a fetus is non the uniform as killing a person.The word murder is untold use by pro-lifers to guide abortion. Murder governance agencydeliberate and unwarrantable killing of few o ther person containing intent. How stick out any frame down an repulsiveness intent in a charrs decisionto interrupt gestation period if it is a prove of rape or incest? A adult female bathroom nonbear the thought of having a child that would be a constant monitoring device ofwhat had happened on such(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) and such a sidereal day, such and such tour of classs ago. She doesnt urgency to kill a pander she fatalitys to interrupt the tempo-up of anembryo so that it volition non become a fuck up. She interrupts potential life. except potential life is just that, potential.Theres an argument until these geezerhood that a fetus is a person that is very(a) from the rest of us and that it deserves rights equal to womens. On this question at that maculation is a horrific spectrum of unearthly, philosophical, scientific, and health check opinion. Its been argued for centuries. Fortunately, our partnership has recognized that each charr must be able to make this decision, establish on her own conscience. To impose a law defining a fetus as a person, granting it rights equal to or superior to a muliebritys thinking, tonicitying, conscious gay cosmos is compulsory and absurd.It lonesome(prenominal)(prenominal) serves to settle women. A fetus is like a body social function in womens body not an unmarried person and jakes only be recognized as a person since the day it is born. It is not registered as a citizen in the political relations book and is not even considered as existing person. So killing a fetus open fire be called as get disembarrass of a body part. And, it is not the governments vocation to teach the citizens how to love. slew learn about love from their pargonnts, from their religion and relatives and participation. Government incline build a law ground on how it is red ink to affect the line of credit of the citizens.It is like we croupt make believe a war because it is n ot niminy-piminy to kill commonwealth. What if some(prenominal) other earth attacks us? Are we waiver to sit and storage argona until we die? We should foster out coun humble and our selves and the selfsame(prenominal) goes with abortion, we pick out to protect ourselves if we see harm is feeler to us. On the other fleet, Abortion is a difficult break through when it is viewed from a religious pointof view. On one hand in that location is the principle against murder, which begsthe question of whether a fetus is a pitying or not. There is a charge inthe account book, which deals specifically with the act of causing woman toabort a pregnancy. In hejira 2122-25 we read And if men struggle andstrike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet thither is no but injury, he shall be fined as the womans economize may use up of him,and he shall be as the resolve decide. But if there is any advertize injury,then you shall apportion as a penalty life for life, eye for eye, tooth fortooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, edit for burn, wound for wound, breachfor bruise( in the raw rewrite model Version, Exodus 2122). In this passage we find a woman losing her child by organism stuck by men who atomic number 18 fighting.Rather than it cosmosness a enceinte offense,however it is disembodied spirited as a civilian matter, with the bewilder to be takingthe participants to hail for a settlement. But, as we read on, if thewoman is killed, a life for a life, then the men who killed her shall bekilled. around shake claimed that the life for a life part is talking aboutthe violate, but in this passage we also read, Tooth for a tooth. Fetuses/babies do not make teeth when they argon born. Thus we foot see thatif the screw up is lost, it does not rent a termination sentence it is notconsidered murder. But if the woman is lost, it is considered murder andis punished by death.I do not want to say that abortion is Biblical, but Ijust want to show that there can be arguments on some(prenominal) sides and a perspicacityagainst people in Gods name should be suss outped. As we become seen above every individual form their own opinion on abortion, depending on their religion and beliefs. If the pro- life group doesnt support abortion they assumet retain to do it. The law doesnt force you to collapse abortion in any case. So people against abortion collectible to their religions or beliefs shouldnt kick against abortion because it is their in the flesh(predicate) preference. Religious political orientation is no existence for any law.Freedom of religion is guaranteed to any citizen in the United States, so why would the beliefs and determine of one religion mandate actual laws for all citizens? It would be unfair, unjust andimmoral. We do not affirm laws against eating fish, nor do we hold in laws that halt it is legal to transmit ones daughter, rape mortal, or keep a person as slave -all intimacys that argon promoted in religious text. There argon also few pro-life people that claim women be using abortion as a birth control. By that they b helpingto women ar qualifying to be irresponsible and depart puddle susceptible finish since abortion is legal.This is proven to be untrue by Ms heather Boonstra. She is a precedential Public form _or_ system of government Associate in the Guttmacher Institutes uppercase, DC. On the member Abortion in Womens Lives that she make in 2006 she states, from time to time the number of women having abortion is lessen (3). Here is here summarized graph. pic As we can see in the graph the number of women having abortion has been brea topic out down since 1981, which proves that women ar using abortion in supernumerary cases not as birth control. other than that, abortion plays a big role in some exceptional cases.We dont hear it that frequently but there is cozy recounting betwixt two people called incest. In commentary Incest is familiar inter dividing line amongst squiffy relatives that is unratified in the jurisdiction where it takes place and is conventionally considered a taboo. The term may apply to inner activities between individuals of reason out blood kin members of the same plate step relatives think by liveance or pairing and members of the same rank or line of descent (Stritof). nonetheless though it is between families it can be interpreted as informal harassment if it is between an adult and an to a lower place age.It is not judge in out society. mess consider it as the nastiest thing that human universe would do. If by any observe someone becomes a victim of incest, their family and friends get out insulate them for their rest of their lives. Likewise, when a girl is rape, she feels dreadful. The trauma of existence pillaged could break her down and make her dispirited and that is only the beginning. later she gets raped, in her own eyes, she has no prise or vanity for herself and then comes the embarrassment. Her story in the society lead be impairmentd permanently and everyone entrust look down upon her.Even her own familys reputation ordain be tainted. If she is coerce to brand an outcast pregnancy, the result is undesired children. After the unwished-for tike is born, the puerility that he ordain get volition not be the best one because of how it was originated. At home, the raped woman would not be a good mother and would be deplorable to the s establish onr. thereof, because of this abnormal type of childhood, when the child erects up and becomes a teenager, he allow for often plow to plague and be regard in gangs and drugs. For spokesperson, 40% of African-the Statesn electric s take a leakrs grow up by a whiz mother collect to unplanned agitate or poverty.And 20% of those kids dope off out in midst school (Hanson 141). erst a kid stops expiration to school he or she drive home a high school demote of doing amerciable things in order to get notes. They are among societys most tragic cases, often un criminal maintenanced-for, unloved, brutalized, and abandoned. Those children have a very strong chance of getting trouble or getting arrested or in a worsened case scenario, be killed. in all this could be frustrateed if the mother was allowed to get an abortion early on and she would not have to face all the dishearten and embarrassment for herself and her family. This is not good for children, for families, or for the country.Children need love and families who want and will care for them. Therefore, women who are raped or victims of incest should not be constrained to carry out a pregnancy. Odds are that 1 in 3 women will be victims of sexual violence in her lifetime (Mahkorn and Dolan182). Does that pie-eyed that 33% of all women should be forced to carry out a pregnancy from this violation? Those people eer dont guarantee that they have been in that event until the woman becomes pregnant and all her relatives find out. The violate they have is going to go through a clustering since he is born between two family members.Isolation, bulling, and it is most assertable that he will involve in illegal medicines or drags just to put himself in the inclination since he is most of the time unhappy. These are few of the insalubrious things the child will face, as he got older. This piteous mar will have a lot of problems just because of his produces make a mistake. why would their child take the punishment for what his parents did? Abortion is the only choice here. Many would argue that these women could endure the pregnancy, outgo nearly a year of her life simply re-living the rape and its effects over and over again, to give up a baby at the end of it for adoption.However, we all are sensitive of the detail that there are zillions of casteless children awaiting adoption as we speak who retain unclaimed in fact, UN ICEF estimates that there are 210 meg orphans in the world right straight. If they have no one unstrained to be their parent or guardian, why would another baby have a better chance? In other word abortion will help in fall worlds population. Similarly, World health validation stick on an interesting term about women and pregnancy saying, Every minute, at least one woman dies from complications related to pregnancy or childbirth that convey 529 000 women a year.In addition, for every woman who dies in childbirth, around 20 more than than than stand injury, infection or disease approximately 10 million women each year (10). It is shocking that a lot of women die during pregnancy. People against abortion think that a woman must have the baby once she is pregnant, but that is ridiculous. There are many women in a situation that they cant have a baby. Women have to avoid pregnancy if she has some kind of diseases that gets worse with pregnancy, because it could affect her health or the babys health.For example a dresser cancer women-getting chemotherapy should not get pregnant because she does not live the effect of chemotherapy on the outcome for the fetus. In this case if a women gets pregnant by the way she should think about her health introductory and her babys health second, and have an abortion to begin with the fetus gets older. about people now summate that if the mothers life is in insecurity abortionis acceptable. It depends irrational to let twain die when one can be saved. There are manyother situations in which abortion can be morallyjustified. unrivalled thing is obvious.These pregnancies were not planned andthey are abdicable. Children born to these mothers are biologicalaccidents. In my opinion it is prankish to bring unreserved and defenselesschildren into the world when theywill not be cared for. every over the humankind these are children starving, being raped, dying, being get the better of upbecause theyre unwi shed. They suffer a mountaines from which they neverrecover. Medical researchers also show that unprecious children whose mothersrefused an abortion suffer from sedate psychological disturbancesthroughout their life (Morgentaler, 52).Another reason why I believe that availability of choice is vital forwomen is that if a woman decides to have an abortion, she will do anything to end her pregnancy. This is the reality. There is no such thing as a one hundred-per cent hard-hitting contraceptive which of course results in unwished-for pregnancies. From the illegal days we know many ways in whichwomen aborted themselves. Many women would show caustic detergentsubstances into themselves,producing major burn down of the vaginal palisade and systemic poisoning.Others would enclose a oral contraceptive of potassium, which led toserious lesions. Number of women attempt to dislodge their pregnancies byintroducing knitting needles, turn up hangers, or other metal or woodenobjects into their uteruses. Some women threw themselves down flights ofstairs, and some pithed air into the uterus by means of a small pump usedto snowfall up motorbike tires. ill-gotten abortions were performed by people withno or small-scale health check exam knowledge, in back rooms, in a non-hygienicenvironment. All this led to awful number of deaths but did not stopthe abortions.Anyone who thinks that outlawing abortion makes abortion go international is a fool. It makes it unplayful and it makes it shameful. Womenwill always get abortions. And if we are truly concerned about human lifeand if this is not just a hollow guide word for us we should make abortion honorableand clean office sort of of onerous to make women feel guilty. Additionally, making abortion legal can decrease illegal abortion. Lets look. The following graph was used on the floor of the US Senate during the tumultuous debate on abortion in 1981. It was compiled from appointed U. S. tatistics. As we can see on the graph, abortion was first legalized on 1967 and we can clearly see that after that year the line commencemented to drop sharply which shows that the death of women due to illegal abortion decreased. Simply, truths against abortion do not stop abortion they simply make it less safe. The number of women who get abortions does not change when it goes from being legal to illegal, or vice versa. The only thing that changes is more women die. pic Opponents of abortion calculate to think that women who favour to haveabortions typically do so thoughtlessly.They do not know that a decisionin itself is already harrowingand a very woundful thing for women. Butcan you authentically look the issue of abortion unless you have been in thesituation of perhaps having one? What some people do not seem to down the stairsstand is that abortion is not an blowsy way out. This issue concernedwith badness, and if there is badness there is bitterness and worseness. Woman herself has to make a decision, on which is which. Many people try toforce their beliefs on others and hazard them for their actions. Thesepeople need to judge themselves in front they start to judge others.There is a question that should be answered. Should government be involved in private matters such as abortion? In my opinion government should not interfere with citizens personal problems. Having an abortion is the same as having a kidney surgery. Once a doctor tells you in what condition your kidney is, it is your decision to have a surgery depending on what the doctor said. Even your kidney is in the scourge condition you still have a choice to detain without medication. That doesnt consider as a suicide by the law. It also goes the same with abortion.Would you allow the government to tell you if you could have a kidney engraft or a blood transfusion? Of course not, the fact that we even consider, let alone allow, governments to nonplus a medical procedure is both intuitive and foolish . Depending on your health, your babys health, and your babys future you should have the right to decide weather you want to have an abortion or not. Therefore my theory is that people who spend so much time, energy, and money on anti-abortion campaigns should kind of spend it on the precious children they say need preservation so muchthe ones who are lively and parentless.Imagine if all the specie washed-out on all those billboards and flyers and campaigns were instead either spent adopting or donating to places that are overrun with orphaned children, perhaps some actual believability would be habituated to these people who claim to love children so much. Also, there is the fact of the matter of the more than one million homeless jejuneness in America alone. The number one factor for a child being homeless is physical or sexual affront at home. Perhaps these child-lovers should step in and care for these already-born children as well. If those people really want to stop a bortion, they should turn to methods thatdowork.These involve comprehensive sex education and safe, low-cost contraceptives. Unfortunately, as illogical as it sounds, the people who are most against abortion are also often most against these balkive measures. If they truly wanted to reduce the number of abortions that occur, they would embrace these methods. Additionally, if the Supreme solicit ever declared abortion illegal, only the poor will be adversely affected. The rich will obtain a round-trip fine to one of the European Countries, have an abortion there and return. The poor, do not have enough sometimes even to ay for the bus fare to go downtown. The impact of such a law would be disproportionate. This is in fact what happened before 1973 (before Roe), when abortion was illegal. We must learn from history otherwise we are condemned to repeat it. People who oppose abortion do so usually on religious and moral grounds. They can glide by with their moral standards, no on e is conducting them to have an abortion in the event of rape or incest or some other medical reason. We just ask to be let alone. There is zip fastener more cliquish to a woman then the right to regulate her own fertility and no one has a right to tell her otherwise.Not in U. S. A. not in this down of the free which guarantees individual and total rights? picking is a constitutional right, the Supreme Court says so. Michael Monahan is the author of non-profit organization called the Heritage folk and in is condition Illegal Abortion he says, Id still worry that if you require abortion, it will just go back to back-alley but slaughter and lots of mothers dying. (1). I totally agree with him, stopping abortion will be a totally disaster and we will see more death of women due to illegal abortions.As I mentioned through out the paper, abortion should be the mother and the father choice to do, not the law or the government, because it is key when the mother can have a baby due to health problem, when the baby have no future, when a pregnancy occurs under a circumstances that is not accepted on the society ETC. virginlawsthat are being developed make it harder and harder for women todealwith the problems of pregnancies. Iflawswere qualified leaving the choice up to the families of the new conceived, it would make their lives and their choices a lot easier.My personal belief is that each woman should have a right to decidewhether she wants to can an unwanted pregnancy. For reasons ofwomens right to self-determination, protection of their health, adequatecare of children which are born and in order to prevent child abuse andmental disease, clear access to abortion is a must. just about abortions occurbecause contraceptive method failed, because of a rape or because of a seriousmedical conditionof the mother, which could lead to her death. In thesesituations abortion is often the only way that prevents the birth of anunwanted child or saves a moth ers life.We have seen that abortion is really important to the society. It has allowed us to choose what we want for ourselves, and it also helps us to follow family planning. We have every right to choose whether we want to have an abortion or not. Religious people dont support it but since it is their belief and decision they should not force other people to be like them. It has been proven above that all their arguments were not fully true. The reasons why women have abortions vary. It may be a case of rape,physical or psychological condition.A choice must need to be availableto prevent the birth of unwanted children, to avoid damage to the child aswell as to safeguard the wound up and physical health of women. Preservation of life seems to be kinda a catchword than a genuine goal of theanti-abortion forces what they really want is control. rule over our appearance and power over women. Abortion is a tough choice and the decisionshould be a personal one, without interference o f government or specialinterest groups. Losing safe and legal abortion would mean lessen womento childbearing vessels.It would mean turning our backs on thetechnology we have, and it will also undervalue women as self-sufficing humanbeings. It would bring more nonmeaningful deaths from the illegal and self- bring on abortions and more pain for women. Works Cited Barbier, Jean, and Georges Goree. Mother Teresa The Love of Christ. untried York Harper Row, 1982. Print. Boonstra, Heather. nominate Questions for Consideration as a hot Federal teenager Pregnancy bar Initiative is Implemented. initiatory. ed. 13. capital of the United States DC Guttmacher constitution Review, 2010. Print. Hanson T. , McLanahan, S. and Thomson, E. (1996).Double endangerment agnate employment and Stepfamily Outcomes for Children. journal of conjugal union and the Family, 58(1) 141-154. Print. Head, Tom. What is Abortion? Web. 10 Dec. 2011. Lewis, Jone. Abortion business relationship Web. 10 D ec. 2011. Mahkorn Dolan, sexual shock & Pregnancy. In smart Perspectives on homosexual Abortion,University publishing company of Amer. , 1981, pp. 182-199 Monhan, Michael. Illegal Abortion. Web. Morgentaler, Henry. Abortion and Contraception. 1st ed. Beaufort Books, 1982. Print. Stritof, Bob. Prohibited Marraige. Web. The sweet Oxford Annotated Bible With the questionable/Deuterocanonical Books, impudently Revised normal Version.Michael D. Coogan, editor. naked as a jaybird York Oxford UP, 2001. Print. WHO. dominion supply brute for agnatic and in the rawborn wellness dodging Implementation. 6-13. Print. Bibliography Barbier, Jean, and Georges Goree. Mother Teresa The Love of Christ. New York Harper Row, 1982. Print. Boonstra, Heather. key out Questions for Consideration as a New Federal immature Pregnancy bar Initiative is Implemented. 1st. ed. 13. Washington DC Guttmacher insurance Review, 2010. Print. CNN Obama Pro-choice, Not Pro-Abortion Ad Video. (2008). 12 Nov. 2011 Hanson T. , McLanahan, S. and Thomson, E. (1996).Double Jeopardy Parental Conflict and Stepfamily Outcomes for Children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(1) 141-154. Print. Head, Tom. What is Abortion? Web. 10 Dec. 2011. Lewis, Jone. Abortion History Web. 10 Dec. 2011. Mahkorn Dolan, Sexual Assault & Pregnancy. InNew Perspectives on Human Abortion,University Publisher of Amer. , 1981. Print. Monhan, Michael. Illegal Abortion. Web. Morgentaler, Henry. Abortion and Contraception. 1st ed. Beaufort Books, 1982. Print. Reagan, L. J. When Abortion was a Crime, Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1867-1973.Univ of California Pr, 1999. Print. Sproul, R. C. Abortion, a Rational explore at an ablaze Issue. Reformation perpetrate Publishing, 2010. Print. Stritof, Bob. Prohibited Marraige. Web. 24 November 2011. The New Oxford Annotated Bible With the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, New Revised Standard Version. Michael D. Coogan, editor. New York Oxford U P, 2001. Print. WHO. District Planning Tool for Maternal and newborn infant Health Strategy Implementation. 6-13. Print. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Abortion Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 22 July 2004. Web. 10 Aug. 2011